A 1% investment management fee looks trivial. Once you rely on the portfolio for income, the cost looks very different.
JL Collins is an author and investor whose approach to building long-term wealth was shaped by five decades in the market. His book, The Simple Path to Wealth, has helped hundreds of thousands of people understand investing and financial independence through low-cost, broad-based index funds.
JL recalls Vanguard founder Jack Bogle’s warning that “performance comes and goes, but fees are forever.” The problem is that fees are usually presented as a percentage of the portfolio’s total value, which can make their effect appear smaller than it is.
That effect becomes clearer when the fee is compared with portfolio income. JL Collins uses the 4% withdrawal guideline to explain how an investor might draw income from a portfolio while expecting it to last over the long term. A $1 million portfolio would provide $40,000 at that withdrawal rate. A 1% management fee charged against the same balance would cost $10,000, equal to 25% of the planned annual withdrawal.
The fee still represents 1% of the assets, but that percentage conceals how much of the investor’s usable income it absorbs.
So you’re paying more for less. I’m in favor of paying less for more.
Investors reviewing a managed portfolio should calculate each recurring fee as a percentage of the annual income they expect to draw. That comparison shows what the service must add to justify its cost and whether the fee remains acceptable once the portfolio becomes a source of income.
Melissa’s Take
During this conversation, I initially thought about fees as money that could have remained invested. JL’s example made me look at the cost from a different direction.
One percent can sound small because it is presented against the largest number in the discussion: the total portfolio. The income I expect the portfolio to provide is much smaller, which makes the same charge far more significant.
That changes the question I would ask. I would want to know how much of my future income I am giving up for the service and what I receive in return. The percentage alone does not answer either part.
My gateway action is to take the total annual fees on one investment account and divide them by the annual income I expect that account to provide. That figure shows the share of my usable investment income being paid to someone else before I receive it.
This is part of a fuller conversation with JL Collins about why simple investment strategies often outperform complex ones, how market volatility affects investor behavior, defining financial independence, avoiding debt, and the advantage of beginning to invest early.
The Full Executive Brief goes deeper into every conversation on the podcast, with the context and the follow-up you won’t get from the audio alone. Subscribers also get access to the Maverick Test, a short diagnostic built to show you where your own leadership has gaps you haven’t named yet.
A show for the new generation of leaders. Join us as we discover unconventional leadership strategies not traditionally associated with executive roles. Our guests include upper-level C-Suite executives charting new ways to grow their organizations, successful entrepreneurs changing the way the world does business, and experts and thought leaders from fields outside of Corporate America that can bring new insights into leadership, prosperity, and personal growth – all while connecting on a human level. No one has all the answers – but by building a community of open-minded and engaged leaders we hope to give you the tools you need to help you find your own path to success.